Cabin crew rostering resulting in fatigue
The concern related to a rostered standby duty that could result in cabin crew being fatigued if they were called upon to work.
The concern related to a rostered standby duty that could result in cabin crew being fatigued if they were called upon to work.
The concern was reported by a captain who was concerned that the cabin crew were not given the opportunity to stand down due to fatigue after a flight was diverted.
The concern related to the passenger briefing, in particular when life jackets should be inflated in the event of an emergency.
The concern related to the lack of support and treatment of staff after a ground handling accident that resulted in serious injury.
The concern related to the operator’s management of the incremental train control system.
The concern related to the poor standard of track in the network leading to a number of major derailments on the mainline, and drivers being instructed to follow a computer based driving system even when they did not think the system was driving the train in the safest manner.
The concern related to the delay in responding to a fault in the system which prevents the unintended use of a section of track in the computerised train control system.
The concern related to the number of drivers with sufficient qualifications to effectively design a roster which does not induce fatigue in the driver population.
The concern related to the reduced driver training provided after track separation works had been completed.
The concern related to the stress being placed on cabin crew in their normal duties by emergency procedure spot checks.