The ship’s safety management system did not have adequate controls to manage the risk of a complete power failure due to generators being inadvertently left in manual mode during manoeuvring operations.
QantasLink's radio procedure required crew to use communications panel radio 2 (COM 2) to broadcast and receive on local frequencies during operations at a non‑controlled aerodrome. This reduced the likelihood of the Dash 8 receiving the calls from other aircraft at either end of runway 05/23 at Wagga Wagga in certain circumstances.
The Australian Airline Pilot Academy flying school flight crew operation manual only required pilots to select ALT on the transponder, as part of the Pre Line Up Scan Action Flow and associated Checklist prior to entering the runway. The use of a transponder during taxi would normally provide an additional source of positional data to other pilots, aiding visual identification and alerted 'see‑and‑avoid' to other aircraft.
The Part 139 (Aerodromes) Manual of Standards 2019 did not recommend, or provide standardised options for, movement area guidance signs or other visual aids to provide enhanced flight crew situational awareness of temporary changes to the runway length available for take-off.
Bamboo Airways did not ensure that its flight dispatchers highlighted to flight crews all types of flight information most critical for flight safety.
The Australian Aeronautical Information Publication requirement for flight crews to confirm automatic terminal information service (ATIS) identifier with air traffic control did not provide positive assurance that crews had received the information in full, which included essential information on aerodrome conditions, and there were no standard air traffic control communication procedures for providing this assurance.
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 14 standards and recommended practices did not recommend, or provide standardised options for, movement area guidance signs or other visual aids to provide enhanced flight crew situational awareness of temporary changes to the runway length available for take-off.
Malaysia Airlines did not ensure that its flight dispatchers highlighted to flight crews all types of flight information most critical for flight safety.
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 11 requirement for flight crews to confirm automatic terminal information service (ATIS) identifier with air traffic control did not provide positive assurance that crews had received the information in full, which included essential information on aerodrome conditions, and there were no standard air traffic control communication procedures for providing this assurance.
A number of the risk controls established by Fremantle Ports to ensure the safe entry of large container vessels were ineffective. These included:
The type rating training provided by Air Link taught pilots to apply an incorrect landing distance factor, which reduced the safety margin when determining the required landing distance at a destination aerodrome.
AirMed required pilots to apply an incorrect landing distance factor, which reduced the safety margin when determining the required landing distance at a destination aerodrome. Furthermore, its procedures were unclear on how the factor should be applied, when the assessment should be conducted and how runway surface condition should be considered.
On board the Wisdom Venture, a permanent modification to the steam drain line was implemented without documentation. During the modification process, change was not incorporated into a risk assessment and no formal review was conducted. This undocumented change likely introduced a system vulnerability that undermined the effectiveness of the steam system isolation.
Response by master of Wisdom Venture and ship manager
A modification to the cargo heating main steam system drain line was not identified during multiple company superintendent’s visits. This resulted in the Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) management of change framework, which required that any system modifications be subject to formal risk assessment and documentation, not being effectively applied.
Response by Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong)
ASL Airlines Australia employed and promoted pilots earlier than the prescribed minimum experience hours without additional controls in place to manage the risk of lower experienced pilots on the flight deck.
The Kuwait Livestock Transport & Trading Company's planned maintenance system did not provide enough detail to track maintenance schedules, and did not have a specific maintenance item to record the maintenance activities on the main engine pneumatic system.
Response by Kuwait Livestock Transport & Trading Company
The Fremantle Pilots’ operational practice of using VHF channel 8 for communication with Fremantle VTS during Inner Harbour transits was not consistent with the port procedures and prevented effective communication.
Response by Fremantle Pilots
The Regional Express dispatch procedures and training did not explain the appearance, function and importance of the propeller straps or orientation of propeller blades. This provided airport services officers limited guidance on how the propellor strap was used and how to identify it had been removed.
Regional Express did not define the roles and expectations for trainers and trainees during practical ground handling training. During practical training for personnel who had not yet been assessed as competent, there was insufficient clarity for who had responsibility for assuring that safety sensitive checks and other tasks had been conducted.
The Queensland Rail alarm response procedure and automated messaging system used at the Rail Management Centre were ineffective in providing network operations staff timely notification of alarms from the environmental monitoring stations in the Glass House Mountains to Gympie North control area.
