Following comments from the reporter in relation to this REPCON an email was sent to the aerodrome operator with the following comments: I have received a response from my reporter with a couple of comments which I thought I would pass on in the interests of safety and cooperation at the aerodrome. This is not to apportion blame and from your response to the REPCON, I understand that you have done all the required preparation for the closure, but if things can be done to ensure that everyone is aware of what is happening, then we may get less issues arising. Firstly, the reporter acknowledged…

After receiving this REPCON the ATSB has reopened this safety issue and the investigation team has been in contact with the operator involved. The ATSB will monitor the outcome of their response to ensure that the safety issue is addressed. 

The ATSB investigates with the sole aim of improving safety. It is not a function of the ATSB to apportion blame or determine liability. ATSB investigations are not the product of an individual. Each investigation is overseen by an investigation team, goes through a through a thorough peer review process and subsequently a review by the team manager, the General Manager and then the Commission. This process ensures that no investigation is significantly biased due to a particular investigator’s background or experiences. As a result of this REPCON report, the ATSB reassessed the Safety…

The ATSB sent the following comments from the reporter to CASA, after the procedure was incorporated into the operator’s flight procedures: There have been no issues that I am aware of relating to single engine taxi.  This owing to the short time from implementation. I would like to highlight one area.  When dealing with the checklist:  while, on the ground, the Captain is responsible for conducting a recall item, there is still a need for the FO to maintain situational awareness of the drill.  For example, in the event of incapacitation, or should the recall not be…