Level crossing collision at Mundoo, Queensland

Summary

At 1118 Eastern  on 1 January 2009 a laden waste disposal truck drove into the path of The Sunlander passenger train at the Aerodrome Road level crossing, Mundoo (near Innisfail) North Queensland. The two lead locomotives and following six carriages derailed in the collision. As a result of the collision the truck driver was fatally injured. Both of the train drivers, nine passengers and four QR on-board staff members sustained minor to moderate injuries. Of those injured, six passengers and one QR employee were taken to hospital for observation.

The investigation was conducted by the Department of Transport and Main Roads in accordance with provisions of Queensland's Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (the Act), independently chaired by a senior rail safety investigator of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

Rail safety in Queensland is regulated by the Department of Transport and Main Roads. All railway managers and/or railway operators within Queensland are required to be accredited in accordance with the Act. The Department of Transport and Main Roads' role in rail safety also includes the investigation of railway incidents.

The final report is available via Queensland Transport.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number RE-2009-001
Occurrence date 01/01/2009
Location Mundoo
State Queensland
Report release date 13/08/2009
Report status Final
Investigation level Systemic
Investigation type External Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Rail
Rail occurrence category Level Crossing
Occurrence class Accident
Highest injury level Fatal

Train details

Train number The Sunlander
Type of operation Passenger Train
Departure point Cairns, QLD
Destination Brisbane, QLD
Train damage Substantial

Birdstrike, Boeing 767-338, VH-OGJ, Melbourne Airport, Victoria, on 3 October 2006

Summary

At 1837 Eastern Standard Time on 3 October 2006, a Boeing Co 767-338 aircraft, registered VH-OGJ, with a crew of 11 and 125 passengers, commenced the take-off roll on runway 27 at Melbourne Airport, Vic, on a scheduled passenger service to Sydney, NSW. The sun had set at 1826.

During rotation of the aircraft, the crew noticed a large flock of birds (estimated between 20 and 50 birds) converging with the aircraft's flight path. With no evasive manoeuvre available to the crew at this stage of flight, the aircraft encountered the flock and sustained multiple strikes on many parts of the aircraft. Immediately following the strikes, the crew checked the engine instruments and noticed that the left engine vibration indicator had risen to about 4.5 units. The crew reduced power on the left engine and that reduced the vibration levels. The crew reported that, based on the stable EGT and the vibration level on the left engine being below the limit provided by maintenance watch, they elected to continue the flight to Sydney rather than return to Melbourne.

The investigation found that the decision to continue the flight did not fully take into account the potential effect of the birdstrike on the durability of the left engine, nor did it account for the performance of the aircraft if the right engine ceased operating during the flight.

Following the occurrence, the operator implemented a policy for their twin engine fleet that if a birdstrike to an engine is known to have occurred and there is obvious sign of engine damage, then a landing at the nearest suitable airport should be made.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number 200605807
Occurrence date 03/10/2006
Location Melbourne Airport
State Victoria
Report release date 29/06/2007
Report status Final
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Aviation
Aviation occurrence category Birdstrike
Occurrence class Incident
Highest injury level None

Aircraft details

Manufacturer The Boeing Company
Model 767
Registration VH-OGJ
Serial number 25274
Sector Jet
Operation type Air Transport High Capacity
Departure point Melbourne, Vic
Destination Sydney, NSW
Damage Minor

Controlled flight into terrain - 11 km south-east of Kokoda Airstrip, Papua New Guinea, 11 August 2009, P2-MCB, De Havilland Canada DHC-6-300

Preliminary report

Preliminary report released 18 September 2009

This accident is being investigated by the Papua New Guinea Accident Investigation Commission (AIC) in accordance with its obligations under Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The AIC requested the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) to assist their investigation by providing investigator support, information and technical advice and facilities support.

In accordance with paragraph 5.23 of Annex 13, the ATSB appointed an Accredited Representative and a number of advisors to the Accredited Representative (ATSB investigators) to assist the AIC during the on-site phase, in the technical examination of a number of recovered aircraft items and components, and as requested by the AIC during the remainder of the investigation. In addition, the ATSB supported the AIC in the development of its Preliminary Factual Report. An abstract drawn from that report follows:

At about 1055 local time on 11 August 2009, the pilot of a De Havilland DH-6 Twin Otter (Twin Otter) aircraft, registered P2-MCB, reported departure from Jacksons Aerodrome, Port Moresby on a charter flight to Kokoda, Papua New Guinea. On board the aircraft were two crew and 11 passengers. The weather in the area was forecast to include isolated showers and thunderstorms, with areas of rain. In addition, significant layers of cloud were forecast from 800 ft above ground level to 18,000 ft, with isolated embedded Cumulo Nimbus cloud within those layers.

The pilot's estimated time of arrival at Kokoda was 1120.

The flight service operator for the area made a number of attempts to contact the pilot by radio in order to advise of other traffic but without success. At 1135, another of the company's aircraft that was in the area advised flight service that the Twin Otter had not arrived at Kokoda.

At about 0810 on 12 August 2009, a search aircraft detected an emergency locator transmitter signal and, shortly after, visually identified aircraft wreckage on the eastern side of the Kokoda Gap, about 6 NM (11 km) south-east of Kokoda Aerodrome.

The aircraft had impacted steep, heavily-timbered terrain in a near-level attitude and was seriously damaged. The aircraft occupants were fatally injured.

The investigation is continuing and will include:

  • examination of the items that were recovered from the accident site
  • review of the relevant operational documentation
  • review of the aircraft's weight and balance
  • review of the forecast and actual weather conditions at the time of the occurrence
  • conduct of a number of interviews with relevant persons and organizations
  • review of the relevant risk controls and potential organisational influences that may have contributed to the development of the occurrence.

A full copy of the Papua New Guinea Accident Investigation Commission report titled Aircraft accident interim report involving DH-6. P2-MCB near Kokoda on the 11 August 2009 (File ref AS.09.1005) is available from the link on the right.

Any media enquiries in respect of the AIC report should be directed to:

Mr David Inau
CEO, Accident Investigation Commission
Telephone: +675 311 2406
Email: ceoaicpng@hotmail.com

Address:  
Accident Investigation Commission    
PO Box 1790, Boroko
National Capital District
Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

Summary

The Papua New Guinea Accident Investigation Commission (AIC) has released its Final Report into the controlled flight into terrain that occurred near Kokoda, Papua New Guinea on 11 August 2009, involving a De Havilland DH-6 Twin Otter aircraft, registration P2-MCB. The AIC investigated this accident, together with support from the Papua New Guinea Department of Transport, in accordance with its obligations under Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The AIC requested the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) to assist their investigation by providing investigator support, information and technical advice and facilities support.

In accordance with paragraph 5.23 of Annex 13, the ATSB appointed an Accredited Representative and a number of advisors to the Accredited Representative (ATSB investigators) to assist the AIC during the on-site phase, in the technical examination of a number of recovered aircraft items and components, and as requested by the AIC during the remainder of the investigation.

The ATSB is reproducing the AIC report titled Controlled flight into terrain, 11 km south-east of Kokoda Airstrip, Papua New Guinea, 11 August 2009, P2-MCB, de Havilland Canada DHC-6-300 on its web site with the permission, and on behalf of the Commission. An abstract drawn from that report follows:

On 11 August 2009, a de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter aircraft, registered P2-MCB, with two pilots and 11 passengers, was being operated on a scheduled regular public transport service from Port Moresby to Kokoda Airstrip, Papua New Guinea (PNG)

At about 1113, the aircraft impacted terrain on the eastern slope of the Kokoda Gap at about 5,780 ft above mean sea level in heavily-timbered jungle about 11 km south-east of Kokoda Airstrip. The aircraft was destroyed by impact forces. There were no survivors.

Prior to the accident the crew were manoeuvring the aircraft within the Kokoda Gap, probably in an attempt to maintain visual flight in reported cloudy conditions. The investigation concluded that the accident was probably the result of controlled flight into terrain: that is, an otherwise airworthy aircraft was unintentionally flown into terrain, with little or no awareness by the crew of the impending collision.

The investigation identified a number of factors that led to increased safety risk. Those related to the crew of the aircraft, the weather conditions affecting the flight, crew training and the conduct of the flight. A number of the safety factors had the potential to adversely affect the safety of future aviation operations.

As a result of the investigation, the Accident Investigation Commission of PNG (AIC PNG) issued a safety recommendation in respect of the installation of cockpit voice recorders (CVR) in PNG aircraft with a seating capacity of 18 or more passengers. In response, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority of PNG (CASA PNG) intends legislating to require the installation of CVRs in turbine-powered aircraft with seating for more than nine passengers. As a result of the investigation, CASA PNG has also established a principal medical officer position and has advised of action to move responsibility for the administration of the PNG mandatory occurrence notification system to the AIC PNG. Extensive proactive safety action has been taken by the aircraft operator in response to the risk of inadvertent flight into cloud while employing visual flight procedures and in regard to operations into Kokoda Airstrip an effort to prevent a recurrence.

A full copy of the Papua New Guinea AIC report titled Controlled flight into terrain, 11 km south-east of Kokoda Airstrip, Papua New Guinea, 11 August 2009, P2-MCB, de Havilland Canada DHC-6-300 (File ref AS 09 1005) is available from the 'Download Final Report' link titled on the right, immediately above the 'Feedback' tab.

Any media enquiries in respect of the AIC report should be directed to:

Mr David Inau
CEO, Accident Investigation Commission
Telephone: +675 311 2406
Email: ceoaicpng@hotmail.com

Address:  
Accident Investigation Commission    
PO Box 1790, Boroko
National Capital District
Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

______________

Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number AE-2009-050
Occurrence date 11/08/2009
Location 11 km south east of Kokoda airstrip, Oro province of PNG
State International
Report release date 31/03/2011
Report status Final
Investigation level Systemic
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Aviation
Aviation occurrence category Collision with terrain
Occurrence class Accident
Highest injury level Fatal

Aircraft details

Manufacturer De Havilland Canada/De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Model DHC-6 300 series
Registration P2-MCB
Serial number 441
Sector Turboprop
Operation type Charter
Departure point Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
Destination Kokoda, Papua New Guinea
Damage Destroyed

Crosswind landing event, Melbourne Airport, Victoria, Airbus A340-642, HS-TNA, on 26 October 2005

Interim report

Interim Factual report released 8 December 2005

At 1200 Eastern Standard Time (EST) on 26 October 2005, the outboard bead heel of the number-1 wheel tyre on the left main landing gear (MLG) of an Airbus A340-642 aircraft, registered HS-TNA, separated from the outboard rim of the wheel assembly during a landing on runway 16 at Melbourne International Airport, Victoria. The landing was conducted during strong crosswind conditions. The aircraft was on a scheduled passenger service from Bangkok, Thailand, with a crew of 19 and 247 passengers. The copilot was the handling pilot for the flight. There were no reported injuries to any of the aircraft occupants.

aair200505311_001.jpg

The number 1 wheel tyre deflated immediately after the bead heel separated from the wheel rim. The tyre then partially disintegrated during the remainder of the landing roll, and the tyre tread detached from the tyre casing (see Appendix 1).

Contact with the runway surface scored and scratched the outboard rim of the number 1 wheel assembly after the tyre deflated (see Figure 2).

aair200505311_002.jpg

Fragments of rubber dislodged from the disintegrating tyre resulted in some minor skin damage to the underside of the left wing and the left underside of the fuselage near the left MLG. Rubber fragments also broke off a small portion of the left MLG fairing door and dislodged a small inspection panel on the inboard side of the number 2 engine pylon. The disintegrating tyre also damaged a hydraulic brake line on the left MLG. The heat from the rear left MLG inboard wheel-brake assembly ignited hydraulic fluid, which leaked from the damaged brake line. The airport rescue and fire fighting service rapidly extinguished the fire.

The number 1 wheel rim damaged the surface of runway 16 after the tyre separated from the rim (see Figure 3). Appendix 2 depicts the extent of the markings and gouging to the surface of runway 16/34 as a result of the occurrence.

aair200505311_003.jpg

The Bureau of Meteorology weather radar data indicated that a cold front passed through Melbourne International Airport at about 1130. The 0200 Coordinated Universal Time (1200 EST) aerodrome routine meteorological report for Melbourne Airport included information that the wind direction and speed were 260 degrees true (T) at 23 kts, gusting to 29 kts. Melbourne Airport automatic terminal information service 'Yankee', issued at 1130, included information that the wind direction and speed were 230 to 280 degrees magnetic (M) at 18 to 30 kts, with a maximum crosswind of 14 kts.

The preliminary solid state flight data recorder (SSFDR) parameters examined by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) included:

  • wind speed (kts) and direction (degrees T)
  • radar altimeter (RALT, providing absolute altitude in feet above ground level)
  • aircraft heading (degrees M)
  • aircraft roll (degrees)
  • aircraft landing gear AIR/GROUND status
  • vertical and lateral accelerometer 'g' loadings.

The data revealed that the wind direction during the landing approach from 850 ft RALT was about 250 degrees T, allowing for some minor variations. Wind speed from between 850 ft and 400 ft RALT was about 22 kts, with a maximum 27 kts occurring at 500 ft RALT. From 400 ft RALT, the wind speed reduced to about 18 kts. About 6 seconds before touchdown, the wind speed began to increase and reached a peak of 40 kts about a 1⁄2 second before the right MLG parameter transitioned from AIR to GROUND.

The aircraft's heading remained relatively constant between 166 and 168 degrees M from 850 ft RALT, then increased to 175 degrees M, coincident with the wind gust encountered just before touchdown. The aircraft touched down with 15 degrees right yaw ('crab'), on a heading of 175 degrees M, and rolled in a 5-degree right wing low attitude.

The right MLG parameter was the first to transition from AIR to GROUND at touchdown, followed by the left MLG, then the centre MLG. The centre MLG parameter then transitioned back from GROUND to AIR, followed by the right MLG, indicating a 'bounced' landing. The right MLG parameter transitioned back to GROUND 1⁄2 second later. The left MLG parameter remained in the GROUND parameter after the initial touchdown.

Touchdown vertical 'g' loading was about 1.6 'g', and lateral 'g' loading was about 0.4 'g' to the left, indicating that the aircraft was in a right sideslip.

The investigation is continuing and will further examine recorded flight and cockpit voice data to better understand the circumstances leading up to the occurrence.

Recorded data covering environmental conditions are also being examined to assess any effect on the aircraft.

Appendix 1

aair200505311_004.jpg

Appendix 2

aair200505311_005.jpg

Summary

At 1200 Eastern Standard Time on 26 October 2005, the outboard bead heel of the number 1 wheel tyre on the left main landing gear (MLG) of an Airbus A340-642 (A340) aircraft, registered HS-TNA, separated from the outboard rim of the wheel assembly during a landing on runway 16 at Melbourne Airport, Vic. The landing was conducted during gusting crosswind conditions.

The number 1 wheel tyre deflated immediately after the bead heel separated from the wheel rim. The tyre then partially disintegrated during the remainder of the landing roll, and the tyre tread detached from the tyre casing. Following the number 1 wheel tyre deflation, the crew-maintained control of the aircraft and, apart from some minor deviations to the left and right of the runway centreline, tracked along the centreline.

The aircraft touched down with 15-degrees of yaw as a result of its handling by the flight crew. That yaw angle was greater than recommended by the aircraft manufacturer and increased the risk of damage to the MLG at touchdown. It also increased the risk that the resultant ground slip angle of the MLG tyres would exceed the saturation point at which they entered a fully skidded state.

The pilot in command made dual side stick inputs during the latter stages of the approach intending to assist the copilot to maintain the attitude and trajectory of the aircraft. Those dual inputs compounded the handling difficulties being experienced by the copilot and increased the associated risks. Those risks could have been mitigated by the pilot in command taking control of the aircraft and pressing the side stick priority pushbutton at the point where he appeared to have become concerned about its attitude and trajectory, instead of making dual side stick inputs.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number 200505311
Occurrence date 26/10/2005
Location Melbourne, Aerodrome
State Victoria
Report release date 29/06/2007
Report status Final
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Aviation
Aviation occurrence category Landing gear/indication
Occurrence class Serious Incident
Highest injury level None

Aircraft details

Manufacturer Airbus
Model A340
Registration HS-TNA
Serial number 677
Sector Jet
Operation type Air Transport High Capacity
Departure point Bangkok, Thailand
Destination Melbourne, VIC
Damage Minor

Technical Analysis: Analysis of a Fractured Fuel Injector Line, Textron Lycoming IO540-C4B5 engine

Summary

A fractured rigid fuel injector line from a Textron Lycoming IO540-C4B5 reciprocating piston engine was received by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau from the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), with a request to determine the mechanism of failure and the likely contributing factors. It was reported that the line had fractured during engine operation, spraying pressurised aviation gasoline into the engine compartment. The released gasoline did not catch fire.

The line had fractured in a single location, adjacent to the union at the injector (cylinder) end. Metallurgical examination determined that the fracture was the end result of high-cycle fatigue crack growth; cracking having initiated at one of a number of large corrosion pits on the lines external surface.

Analytical techniques identified the line as a UNS S30400 austenitic stainless steel; a material susceptible to pitting corrosion attack in the presence of chlorides. Chloride compounds were detected within the corrosion pits and were attributed to the salt-laden air associated with the coastal environment in which the engine/aircraft had been operating.

Safety action initiated as a result of the investigation findings included CASA revising airworthiness directives AD/LYC/90 and AD/CON/60; related to the maintenance of fuel injection supply lines on Textron Lycoming and Teledyne Continental aircraft engines respectively. Additionally, CASA published an information article in their periodical Flight Safety Australia, providing a summary of the event and investigation findings, together with advice and guidelines for maintenance personnel when installing and maintaining fuel injector lines.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number 200601291
Occurrence date 06/03/2003
Location Canberra Central Office
State Australian Capital Territory
Report release date 07/06/2007
Report status Final
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Aviation
Occurrence class Technical Analysis
Highest injury level None

Independent investigation into the loss of the Fiji registered vehicular passenger ferry Princess Ashika, in Tonga, on 5 August 2009

Summary

The ATSB assisted the New Zealand Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TAIC) in their investigation into the loss of the vessel. TAIC is the lead agency in this investigation.

The inter-island ferry, the MV Princess Ashika, sank in Tongan waters 5 August 2009. There were many lives tragically lost. Pursuant to the Royal Commission Act (Cap 41) Laws of Tonga, a Royal Commission into the Sinking of the MV Princess Ashika was established.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number 267-ME-2009-006
Occurrence date 05/08/2009
Location Approximately 11 nautical miles from Nomuka, Ha'apai, Tonga
State International
Report release date 29/06/2010
Report status Final
Investigation level Systemic
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Marine
Marine occurrence category Foundered
Occurrence class Accident
Highest injury level Fatal

Ship details

Name Princess Ashika
IMO number 7234002
Ship type Vehicular passenger ferry
Flag Fiji
Departure point Nuku'alofa, Tonga
Destination Nomuka, Ha'apai, Tonga

Aviation Safety Council of Taiwan, technical assistance, Boeing 747-338, VH-EBW

Summary

On 29 March 2005, the Aviation Safety Council (ASC) of Taiwan notified the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) of an air safety occurrence involving a Taiwanese registered and operated Avions De Transport Regional, ATR72-212A aircraft on 25 December 2003, and requested technical expertise and assistance in reviewing the ASC draft report. The ATSB appointed an accredited representative to participate in the investigation into the occurrence, in accordance with clause 5.23 of Annex 131 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. To protect the information supplied by the ASC to the ATSB and investigative work undertaken to assist the ASC, the ATSB initiated an investigation under the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003. The report presented below was prepared principally from information supplied to the ATSB.

FACTUAL INFORMATION

On 25 December 2003, at about 0815 local time, the crew of a TransAsia Airways, Avions de Transport Regional, Model ATR72-212A, registered B-22805, observed an intermittent and brief illumination of a red warning light on the centralised crew alert system, while on final approach to land at Sungshan International Airport, Taipei, Taiwan. The crew were unable to identify the warning light. Subsequently, during the landing roll, the crew observed the number 1 engine fire warning light illuminate. The fire warning light was extinguished after the flight crew selected the fuel cut-off position with the number 1 fuel condition lever and pulled the fire extinguishing T-handle to discharge the fire bottle. During an after landing inspection of the number 1 engine, a perforation was observed on the top right side of the rear inlet case. There was fire soot around the rear inlet case and fire damage to electrical wires nearby.

The ASC is the independent Taiwan government entity responsible for no blame safety investigation of accidents and incidents in Taiwan. The Australian accredited representatives role in the investigation has been to provide the ASC with technical advice and comment on the draft ASC report.

The final report will be available from the ASC website www.asc.gov.tw on completion of the investigation.

1 Annex 13 Clause 5.23 Any State which on request provides information, facilities or experts to the State conducting the investigation shall be entitled to appoint an accredited representative to participate in the investigation.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number 200501310
Occurrence date 25/12/2003
Location Sangshan, Aero. Taiwan
State International
Report release date 09/08/2005
Report status Final
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Aviation
Aviation occurrence category Miscellaneous - Other
Occurrence class Incident
Highest injury level None

Aircraft details

Manufacturer ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional
Model ATR72
Registration B-22805
Sector Turboprop
Operation type Air Transport High Capacity
Departure point Hualien, Taiwan
Destination Taipei, Taiwan
Damage Minor

Airbus, VH-VND, aircraft diversion, near Canberra Aerodrome, Australian Capital Territory, on 5 August 2009

Summary

On 5 August 2009, during on a scheduled flight from Melbourne, Victoria (Vic) to Mackay, Queensland (Qld), the flight crew of an Airbus A320-232 aircraft, registered VH-VND, were advised of an electrical burning smell in the mid cabin area. Within 5 minutes of that advice, multiple left and right engine warnings were observed on the electronic centralised aircraft monitoring (ECAM) display. The flight was diverted to Canberra, Australian Capital Territory (ACT) where an uneventful landing was conducted.

Subsequent examination found the electrical burning smell had originated from a fluorescent light ballast resistor in the cabin. The ECAM warnings were attributed to an internal fault in the number 2 display management computer (DMC).

Following similar incidents, the DMC manufacturer introduced a cyclic software check of parameters used in the receiving function, with an auto reset of the DMC if corrupted parameters were identified.

The aircraft manufacturer reviewed its operational procedures and provided operators with additional procedures for flight crew to transfer from a faulty DMC to an alternate DMC during flight or reset a faulty DMC on the ground.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number AO-2009-049
Occurrence date 05/08/2009
Location near Canberra Aerodrome
State Australian Capital Territory
Report release date 29/06/2010
Report status Final
Investigation level Short
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Aviation
Aviation occurrence category Avionics/flight instruments
Occurrence class Incident
Highest injury level None

Aircraft details

Manufacturer Airbus
Model A320
Registration VH-VND
Serial number 3296
Sector Jet
Operation type Air Transport High Capacity
Departure point Melbourne, Vic.
Destination Mackay, Qld
Damage Nil

Derailment of Train 5MB7, at Benalla, Victoria

Final report

Executive summary

At approximately 0644 Eastern Standard Time on 2 June 2006 the crew of Interail freight service 5MB7 reported that their train had derailed while traversing the No. 3 points located at the Melbourne end of the Benalla crossing loop. Both locomotives derailed along with 19 wagons. Two track machines stabled within the cripple road adjacent the crossing loop were heavily damaged along with the nearby Victorian Railway Institute Hall which sustained severe structural damage.

There were no serious injuries as a result of the collision.

The investigation found that the driver of train 5MB7 had probably failed to correctly interpret and respond to signal ES6377. As a result, he was unable to slow the train to a safe speed when traversing No. 3 points located at Melbourne end of the Benalla crossing loop.

In the interest of enhancing future rail safety the ATSB has made seven recommendations which include a review of crew resource management strategies, an examination of mentoring responsibilities and reviewing processes for the re-certification of drivers.

Download final report

[PDF 3.5 MB (3.45 MB)
]

Rail Recommendations [ RR20070015 ] [ RR20070016 ] [ RR20070017 ] [ RR20070018 ] [ RR20070019 ] [ RR20070020 ] [ RR20070021 ]

Occurrence summary

Investigation number 2006005
Occurrence date 02/06/2006
Location Benalla
State Victoria
Report release date 29/06/2007
Report status Final
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Rail
Rail occurrence category Derailment
Occurrence class Accident
Highest injury level Minor

Train details

Train number 5MB7Q
Type of operation Freight Train
Departure point Melbourne, Vic
Destination Brisbane
Train damage Substantial

Fatal Level Crossing Collision - Bumbunga, South Australia, on 1 August 2009

Final report

Abstract

At about 1535 on Saturday 1 August 2009, the lead locomotive of Pacific National (PN) freight train 5PM5 collided with a utility motor vehicle at the Bumbunga level crossing in South Australia (SA).

The utility vehicle was seriously damaged as a result of the collision and the male driver and a female passenger were fatally injured.

The train driver was uninjured. The lead locomotive of the train incurred minor damage, mainly to the headstock/pilot at the front of locomotive. The track and level crossing infrastructure incurred moderate damage that consisted of damaged rail fasteners and gouging of the road surface at the level crossing.

Occurrence summary

Investigation number RO-2009-006
Occurrence date 01/08/2009
Location Bumbunga
State South Australia
Report release date 24/05/2010
Report status Final
Investigation level Systemic
Investigation type Occurrence Investigation
Investigation status Completed
Mode of transport Rail
Rail occurrence category Level Crossing
Occurrence class Accident
Highest injury level Fatal

Train details

Train number Train 5PM5
Type of operation Freight Train
Departure point Perth WA
Destination Melbourne VIC
Train damage Minor