Preliminary report
Preliminary report released 2 December 2013
This preliminary report details factual information established in the investigation’s early evidence collection phase and has been prepared to provide timely information to the industry and public. Preliminary reports contain no analysis or findings, which will be detailed in the investigation’s final report. The information contained in this preliminary report is released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003.
The ATSB is investigating the fatal aircraft accident involving a PZL-Mielec M18A Dromader, registered VH-TZJ, that occurred near Ulladulla, NSW at about 1004 on 24 October 2013. The aircraft was being used to conduct firebombing operations and while approaching the target point, the left wing separated. The aircraft immediately rolled left and descended, impacting terrain. The aircraft was destroyed by impact forces and the pilot was fatally injured.
Preliminary examination indicated that the left outboard wing lower attachment lug had fractured through an area of pre-existing fatigue cracking in the lug lower ligament.
Interim report
Interim report released 23 December 2013
This interim report details factual information established in the investigation’s evidence collection phase and has been prepared to provide timely information to the industry and public. Interim reports contain no analysis or findings, which will be detailed in the investigation’s final report. The information contained in this interim report is released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003.
On 24 October 2013, at about 0940 Eastern Daylight-saving Time, the pilot of a PZL Mielec M18A Dromader, registered VH-TZJ, took off from Nowra Airport to conduct a firebombing mission in the Budawang National Park about 37 km west of Ulladulla, New South Wales. At about 1004, while the aircraft was approaching the target point, the left wing separated. The aircraft immediately rolled left and descended, impacting terrain. The aircraft was destroyed by impact forces and the pilot was fatally injured.
Preliminary examination indicated that the left outboard wing lower attachment lug had fractured through an area of pre-existing fatigue cracking in the lug lower ligament.
This Interim Report was released in order to highlight a safety issue that had been identified after the release of the Preliminary Report on 2 December 2013. The safety issue is that operators of some Australian M18 Dromaders,1 particularly those fitted with turbine engines and enlarged hoppers and those operating under Australian supplemental type certificate (STC) SVA521, have probably conducted flights at weights for which airframe life factoring was required but not applied. The report includes a Safety Advisory Notice to M18 operators about this safety issue.
The first sections of this report are the same as the Preliminary Report released on 2 December 2013. Additional information is contained in the Context (Operation of the M18 Dromader at take‑off weights above 4,200 kg), Safety analysis, and Safety action sections regarding the safety issue.
[1] There are three main aircraft variants, the M18, M18A, and M18B, in addition to two-seat trainer versions. Throughout this report, ‘M18’ is used generically to refer to any of the three main variants except where otherwise stated.
Final report
What happened
On 24 October 2013, the pilot of a modified PZL Mielec M18A Dromader, registered VH-TZJ, was conducting a firebombing mission about 37 km west of Ulladulla, New South Wales. On approach to the target point, the left wing separated. The aircraft immediately rolled left and descended, impacting terrain. The aircraft was destroyed, and the pilot was fatally injured.
What the ATSB found
The ATSB found that the left wing separated because it had been weakened by a fatigue crack in the left-wing lower attachment fitting. The fatigue crack originated at small corrosion pits in the attachment fitting. These pits formed stress concentrations that accelerated the initiation of fatigue cracks.
The ATSB also found that, although required to be removed by the aircraft manufacturer’s instructions, the corrosion pits were not completely removed during previous maintenance. During that maintenance, the wing fittings were inspected using an eddy current inspection method. This inspection method was not approved for that particular inspection and may not have been effective at detecting the crack.
Data from a series of previous flights indicated that the manner in which the aircraft was flown during its life probably accelerated the initiation and growth of the fatigue crack.
Finally, the ATSB also found a number of other factors which, although they did not contribute to the accident, had potential to reduce the safety of operation of PZL M18 and other aircraft. These included the incorrect calculation of the flight time of M18 aircraft and a lack of robust procedures for the approval of non-destructive inspection procedures.
What's been done as a result
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) revised the airworthiness directive for inspection of the wing attachment fittings to ensure that they were inspected using the magnetic particle inspection method. CASA also made, or plans to make, a number of changes to their systems and procedures to address issues identified in this report.
Separately, the ATSB reminded operators of M18 aircraft of the importance of the correct application of service life factors when operating at weights above the original maximum take-off weight. In addition, PZL Mielec plans to release additional maintenance documentation clarifying the need for removal of the wings for proper inspection of the wing attachment fittings. Finally, at the request of the owner, the supplemental type certificate for operation of the modified M18 Dromader at take-off weights up to 6,600 kg has been suspended by CASA.
Safety message
This accident shows that even when flying within operational limits, the ‘harder’ and faster an aircraft is flown the more rapidly the structure will fatigue.
To help ensure that maintenance objectives are consistently met, the ATSB reminds aircraft maintenance personnel of the importance of only using properly approved maintenance instructions. This accident confirms the importance of referring directly to those maintenance instructions when conducting maintenance.
Occurrence summary
| Investigation number | AO-2013-187 |
|---|---|
| Occurrence date | 24/10/2013 |
| Location | 37 km west of Ulladulla |
| State | New South Wales |
| Report release date | 15/02/2016 |
| Report status | Final |
| Investigation level | Systemic |
| Investigation type | Occurrence Investigation |
| Investigation status | Completed |
| Mode of transport | Aviation |
| Aviation occurrence category | In-flight break-up |
| Occurrence class | Accident |
| Highest injury level | Fatal |
Aircraft details
| Manufacturer | PZL Mielec |
|---|---|
| Model | M18A |
| Registration | VH-TZJ |
| Serial number | 1Z013-32 |
| Sector | Turboprop |
| Operation type | Aerial Work |
| Damage | Destroyed |