Jump to Content
Download final report
[ Download PDF: 1.69MB]
 
 
 

What happened

On 8 March 2013, the flight crew of a Qantas Airways Limited (Qantas) A330 aircraft, registered VH-EBV, was conducting a visual approach to Melbourne Airport, Victoria. The captain was the pilot flying with autopilot engaged.

Soon after being cleared for the approach, on descent through 3,000 ft, the captain set an altitude target of 1,000 ft in the autoflight system and selected the landing gear down, the first stage of wing flap and 180 kt as the target speed. The descent was continued in autoflight open descent mode and reached a maximum of 2,200 ft/min. As the aircraft was descending through about 1,800 ft the first officer advised the captain that they were low. The captain reduced the rate of descent by selecting autoflight vertical speed mode but a short time later the enhanced ground proximity warning system (EGPWS) provided ‘TERRAIN’ alerts followed by ‘PULL UP’ warnings. The crew carried out an EGPWS recovery manoeuvre and subsequently landed via an instrument approach.

At the time of the EGPWS alert the aircraft had descended to 1,400 ft, which in that area was 600 ft above ground level, with 9 NM (17 km) to run to touchdown. This was 100 ft below the control area lower limit and 1,900 ft below a normal 3° descent profile.

What the ATSB found

The ATSB found that during the visual approach the captain’s performance capability was probably reduced due to the combined effects of disrupted and restricted sleep, a limited recent food intake and a cold/virus. The captain assessed the aircraft’s flight path using glide slope indications that were not valid. This resulted in an incorrect assessment that the aircraft was above the nominal descent profile.

In addition, the combination of the selection of an ineffective altitude target while using the autoflight open descent mode and ineffective monitoring of the aircraft’s flight path resulted in a significant deviation below the nominal descent profile. The flight crew’s action in reducing the aircraft's rate of descent following their comprehension of the altitude deviation did not prevent the aircraft descending outside controlled airspace and the activation of the EGPWS.

The ATSB also identified that limited guidance was provided by Qantas on the conduct of a visual approach and the associated briefing required to ensure flight crew had a shared understanding of the intended approach.

What's been done as a result

In response to this occurrence Qantas updated their training material for visual approaches and enhanced similar material in their captain/first officer conversion/promotion training books. In addition, targeted questions were developed that required check pilot signoff for proficiency. Finally, visual approaches were included as a discussion subject during flight crew route checks for the period 2013–2015.

Safety message

The ATSB reminds operators and flight crew of the importance of continuous attention to the appropriateness of the autoflight system modes in use. Equally, the ATSB stresses the importance of continually monitoring descent profiles, irrespective of the type of approach being flown and the level of automation being used. For flight crew, this occurrence illustrates the need to communicate their intentions and actions to ensure a shared understanding of the intended approach.

 

Download final report
[ Download PDF: 1.69MB]
 
 
 

The occurrence

Context

Safety analysis

Findings

Safety issues and actions

Sources and submissions

Appendices

 
 

To download an image click the download link then right-click the image and select save image as.

Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly.

 

Safety issue

AO-2013-047-SI-01 -  

Visual approach guidance

Qantas provided limited guidance on the conduct of a visual approach and the associated briefing required to enable the flight crew to have a shared understanding of the intended approach.

Safety issue details
Issue number:AO-2013-047-SI-01
Who it affects:Flight crew
Status:Adequately addressed

 
General details
Date: 08 March 2013 Investigation status: Completed 
Time: 1851 EDT Investigation type: Occurrence Investigation 
Location   (show map):15 km NNE, Melbourne Airport Occurrence type:E/GPWS warning 
State: Victoria Occurrence class: Operational 
Release date: 09 July 2015 Occurrence category: Serious Incident 
Report status: Final Highest injury level: None 
 
Aircraft details
Aircraft manufacturer: Airbus 
Aircraft model: A330 
Aircraft registration: VH-EBV 
Serial number: 1365 
Operator: Qantas 
Type of operation: Air Transport High Capacity 
Sector: Jet 
Damage to aircraft: Nil 
Departure point:Sydney, NSW
Destination:Melbourne, Vic.
 
 
 
Share this page Provide feedback on this investigation
Last update 09 July 2015