Aviation safety investigations & reports

Embraer-Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica EMB-820-C, VH-HVA

Investigation number:
Status: Completed
Investigation completed


The pilot, who was of slight build, was tasked with conducting a regular public transport flight, with 6 passengers, from Gunnedah to Sydney (Kingsford Smith) airport. The aircraft, an Embraer EMB-820-C (licence built Piper PA31 Chieftain), had a valid maintenance release with no significant outstanding entries. Pre-flight preparation was normal and unrushed and an on-time departure was accomplished. The weather for the departure was fine with light wind.

Before initiating takeoff from runway 11, the pilot, who was appropriately licensed, endorsed and base checked to fly the EMB-820-C aircraft, carried out engine run-ups and pre-takeoff checks. The pre-takeoff checks included selecting 15 degrees of flap and setting the elevator trim. The pilot's normal trim setting procedure was to wind the trim wheel all the way to the forward limit and then wind it back 5 to 6 complete turns. Consultation with industry pilots experienced on the aircraft type revealed that 3 to 4 turns was common. They indicated that pilots of lesser physical stature have found the aircraft type is easier to rotate with the elevator trim set to a nose-up position for takeoff, however that would result in more re-trimming of the aircraft once airborne and during flap retraction. Low-wing aircraft have a tendency to pitch up slightly during flap retraction. Additionally, as an aircraft climbs out of ground effect, changed downwash over the tailplane produces a further pitch-up tendency.

The pilot reported that the take-off run and rotation appeared normal, however, as the flaps were retracted the elevator load increased. The pilot was only able to preserve a safe climb attitude by using both hands to maintain forward pressure on the control column. The pilot did not use the electric trim in normal day-to-day operations and did not consider using it to relieve the elevator load on that occasion. Believing the problem was either elevator trim or aircraft centre of gravity related, the pilot requested the passengers seated at the rear to move toward the front of the aircraft in order to lighten the load on the controls. A male passenger positioned himself in the unoccupied right control seat and, as the control forces were still high, the pilot requested that the passenger momentarily apply forward pressure on the control column. The pilot then took one hand from the controls to manually trim the aircraft and reduce the power.

The aircraft continued to Sydney without further incident and showed no abnormal handling characteristics on the subsequent sectors. A comprehensive inspection of the aircraft did not reveal any discrepancies with the elevator trim system and a review of the aircraft logbooks indicated no recent reported problems or disturbance of the trim system for rectification work. It was calculated that, at takeoff, the aircraft weight was 39 Kg below the maximum takeoff weight and the centre of gravity was slightly forward of the mid-point between the forward and aft limits.

Prior to the incident flight the pilot had positioned the aircraft to Gunnedah from Coonabarabran. The aircraft, which had no passengers or freight, was landed with full flap and in that configuration would have required almost full-back (nose-up) trim. Although not included in the after-landing checks of the operator's approved Piper Aircraft Corporation paper checklist, it was normal practise for most pilots to re-set the trim when clear of the runway. The Pilot's Operating Handbook expanded checklist recommended that course of action. The expanded checklist was used for training and as a supplement to normal and abnormal checklists. It was not meant to be referred to in flight.


There was insufficient evidence to determine the factors that led to the out of trim condition. The aircraft was correctly loaded and well within the centre of gravity envelope. Appropriately qualified maintenance personnel could find no fault with the trim system after a comprehensive check and the aircraft handled normally on the subsequent sectors. The possibility of a mis-set trim was explored and cannot be excluded. The pilot stated that all the appropriate checks before takeoff were carried out. The before-takeoff checks included setting the trim.

A checklist can be viewed in human factors terms as an additional interface between the human and the machine. That interface controls the method and sequence of the aircraft's configuration. Regardless of the type or method used, the disciplined use of cockpit checklists by pilots is an essential element in flight safety. Distractions and interruptions can break the checklist process and may result in a checklist error or omission. This may be critical in single-pilot operations where the checklist is often the last line of defence against configuration errors. Having ensured that the appropriate training and checking has been carried out, an operator's safety management is dependent on the degree of discipline and professionalism applied to each phase of the operation by the pilot.

General details
Date: 02 January 2001   Investigation status: Completed  
Time: 0820 hours ESuT    
Location   (show map): Gunnedah, Aero.    
State: New South Wales   Occurrence type: Incorrect configuration  
Release date: 09 November 2001   Occurrence category: Incident  
Report status: Final   Highest injury level: None  

Aircraft details

Aircraft details
Aircraft manufacturer Embraer-Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica  
Aircraft model EMB-820  
Aircraft registration VH-HVA  
Serial number 820C-045  
Type of operation Air Transport Low Capacity  
Damage to aircraft Nil  
Departure point Gunnedah, NSW  
Departure time 0820 hours ESuT  
Destination Sydney, NSW  
Crew details
Role Class of licence Hours on type Hours total
Pilot-in-Command Commercial 238 1154
Last update 13 May 2014