Safety issue
| Safety issue description |
There were no published communications procedures or phraseology that should before used by pilots during firebombing operations to provide separation assurance at fire locations when there was no air attack supervisor present. |
|---|---|
| Issue number | AO-2009-075-SI-01 |
| Issue owner | NSW Rural Fire Service |
| Transport function | Aviation: General aviation |
| Date issue released | 29/11/2010 |
| Issue status justification |
Safety action taken by NSW Rural Fire Service |
Safety action
| Action type | Proactive action |
|---|---|
| Action number | AO-2009-075-NSA-095 |
| Organisation | NSW Rural Fire Service |
| Action date | 29/11/2010 |
| Action description |
On 8 October 2010, the NSW Rural Fire Service advised that it had developed a Draft standard operating procedure that particularly addresses 'Mission Management' including the use of standard terminology for aerial firefighting activities. The RFS advised that in November 2010, and on behalf of NSW Fire Agencies, it would be conducting 'a series of workshops for aviation specialists to pass on these changes'. |
| ATSB response |
The ATSB is satisfied that the action by the NSW RFS adequately addresses the safety issue. |
| Action status | Closed |