Reporter's deidentified concern
The reporter has raised a safety concern in relation to bird activity within the vicinity of [Location] Airport.
The reporter is concerned about the extent of bird life activity within the vicinity of [Location] Airport, especially with the increase in aircraft traffic. The reporter advised the Aerodrome Reporting Officers (AROs) have limited resources available to effectively disperse birds.
The reporter states that passenger transport aircraft can at times be delayed on departure, landing and during training. The reporter further states that passenger transport aircraft are occasionally issued hazard alerts due to bird activity close to or above the runway. The reporter advises, 'Wetlands exist to the east of [Location] and large flocks of Ibis and Magpie Geese regularly land or soar within the aerodrome boundary and near the runway'.
The reporter understands that the tools AROs are equipped with for wildlife dispersal include vehicles fitted with lights and sirens, airside gas cannons and stock whips.
The reporter queries why the use of audible pyrotechnic shells dispersed via a firearm (commonly referred to as 'Bird Fright') which is an effective method of wildlife dispersal, is not made available and utilised by AROs at this location.
The reporter finally states, 'Given the risk to aviation operations that a birdstrike presents, I believe a review of the methods available to [Location] ARO staff should be considered, particularly the use of Bird Fright'.
Named party's response
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to REPCON report RA2026-00074 regarding bird activity within the vicinity of [Location].
[Location] Airport maintains a structured and compliant wildlife hazard management framework and does not consider the matters raised to reflect any deficiency in current controls. We offer the following in response:
- The last three CASA surveillance audits have not identified any findings relating to wildlife hazard management. Similarly, the last three Aerodrome Technical Inspections (ATI) have not identified any findings in this area.
- In accordance with the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, Aerodrome Reporting Officers conduct routine bird monitoring and dispersal activities multiple times per day, ensuring continuous oversight and timely response to wildlife activity.
- The species referenced in the report, Australian White Ibis and Magpie Geese, account for 1.57 per cent and 0.59 per cent respectively of recorded bird sightings within the vicinity of the runway strip.
- [Location] Airport holds a current [wildlife control permit] issued by [Government department], which permits the use of lethal control measures for approved species, including Ibis, where operationally required.
- [Location] Airport engages [wildlife consultancy], an established industry specialist, to conduct periodic reviews and support the ongoing development of the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan.
- Aerodrome Reporting Officers do not hold firearms licences. Where firearms-based control is required, this is undertaken by a suitably licensed third-party contractor in accordance with regulatory requirements.
- Aerodrome Reporting Officers undertake regular wildlife hazard management training delivered by [wildlife consultancy] to ensure competency in identification, risk assessment, reporting, and control of wildlife hazards.
- Pyrotechnic dispersal (Bird Fright) has previously been utilised by our contracted pest controller.
- A recent review of the Airservices Australia CIRRIS reports shows that there is no mention of wildlife related reports for the last two years.
[Location] Airport will continue to monitor wildlife activity and review available mitigation measures as part of normal safety management processes. Current controls are considered appropriate, proportionate, and effective.
Regulator's response
Information in the report was sent to the Aviation Regulator, CASA, for information only.
ATSB comment
The ATSB produced and maintains Australia's National Aviation Wildlife Strike Dashboard. The aim of this dashboard is to provide information back to pilots, aerodrome and aircraft operators, regulators, and other aviation industry participants to assist them with understanding and managing the risks associated with bird and animal strikes.
REPCON details
| Date reported | 04/05/2026 |
|---|---|
| Published date | 28/07/2026 |
| Affected operation/industry | Facilities Management |
| Concern subject type | Environmental |
| Transport mode | Aviation |