Radio interference at neighbouring aerodromes with the same CTAF frequency

RA2026-00094

Reporter's deidentified concern

The reporter has raised a safety concern in relation to radio interference at neighbouring aerodromes with the same Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF).

The reporter states, both Stawell and Maryborough (Vic) airports have recently installed Aerodrome Frequency Response Units (AFRU) which operate on the same CTAF frequency. There is now significant radio interference experienced by aircraft operating in the vicinity of either aerodrome. The interference specifically relates to the automated AFRU responses (aerodrome names as well as Maryborough circuit direction information) transmitting at the same time which is illegible to pilots. The reporter further states, the interference is most noticeable when approaching Stawell from the east or Maryborough from the west. The reporter is concerned there is a risk that pilots may not receive or misinterpret radio calls from other aircraft with the interference of the combined AFRU responses.

The reporter acknowledged that installation of the AFRUs is a positive safety action implemented by the aerodrome operators to provide a further tool to increase pilot situational awareness when operating at these aerodromes. However, the reporter is concerned that it is also potentially counter-productive with the risk of miscommunication that could be mitigated with a change of CTAF frequency at either of the aerodromes.

Named party's response

Northern Grampians Shire Council - Stawell aerodrome

The Northern Grampians Shire Council acknowledges receipt of the REPCON correspondence and appreciates the opportunity to comment on the reported safety concern.

Council notes the concern regarding potential radio interference between the Aerodrome Frequency Response Units (AFRUs) at Stawell and Maryborough (Vic) aerodromes, where both aerodromes operate on the same Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF).

The AFRU at Stawell aerodrome was installed as a safety enhancement to improve pilot situational awareness and operates in accordance with the applicable standards and manufacturer specifications.

Council has previously received one informal comment from a local pilot regarding occasional overlap of radio transmissions between Stawell and Maryborough. At the time, the comment was not submitted as a formal safety report, no operational occurrence or incident was identified, and no further reports were received. As the allocation of CTAF frequencies is not determined by the aerodrome operator, there was no indication that the matter resulted from the operation of the Stawell aerodrome or its AFRU.

Following receipt of the REPCON correspondence, Council has reviewed the concern and sought technical advice from Airservices Australia to better understand whether this is a known issue associated with shared CTAF frequencies and whether any mitigation measures are available.

Council understands that CTAF frequency allocation and associated aeronautical communication arrangements are managed at a national level and are outside the direct control of the aerodrome operator.

Council remains committed to the safe operation of Stawell aerodrome and will consider any advice or recommendations provided by Airservices Australia, CASA or the ATSB. Should any operational changes or additional risk controls be identified as appropriate, Council will assess and implement them where reasonably practicable.

Central Goldfields Shire Council - Maryborough aerodrome

No operational changes to the AFRU have occurred in recent years. Staff also advised that CTAF 119.1 was last certified in 2003 and, has not been changed since. A [long-term staff member] does not recall any modifications being made to the frequency during their tenure.

It is also worth mentioning that Maryborough aerodrome will be upgrading its AFRU system in the coming weeks [to add a customisable aerodrome-based recorded information announcement facility].

Airservices Australia

[Airservices has] received advice from the [relevant management and engineering] specialists.

[The 119.1 MHz CTAF frequency is a very old assignment] and frequency congestion can present as an issue as the aerodromes get busier, which can be exacerbated as they have upgraded to AFRU+PALs (Pilot Activated Lighting) on this frequency. On occasion, this issue is also known to present on the wide use of the multicom frequency 126.7 MHz

Airport Operators typically get an AFRU/PAL unit for the Pilot Activated Lighting facility on the CTAF, however it can be reconfigured to a new PAL frequency without the AFRU function, which would require consultation between airport operators. There is a process for requesting a change of CTAF and that is through the [Aviation State Engagement Forum, AvSEF]. The consultation process may need to be kicked off by the affected aerodromes. Airservices would recommend seeking other concerned pilots and aero clubs to raise it with the airport operators or initially raise it with the AvSEF Secretariat [avsef@casa.gov.au].

Airservices office would take our direction following a decision from CASA Office of Airspace Regulation, however, otherwise this is an issue to be managed by the respective aerodrome operators.

Regulator's response

CASA has reviewed the report details, recent occurrence and incident reports, and the airspace arrangements at both Stawell and Maryborough. CASA is satisfied the available information does not indicate an immediate aviation safety concern that would warrant changes to the current airspace arrangements or CTAF frequency allocations at either aerodrome at this time. The current evidence does not support the need for regulatory intervention. 

Should the aerodrome operators consider that a change to the frequency arrangements is desirable, they may seek such a change through CASA’s Request for Change (RFC) process. That process includes consultation with affected stakeholders and consideration through appropriate means including the Aviation State Engagement Forum (AvSEF) to ensure any proposed changes are suitably assessed. 

CASA will continue to monitor the reported issue.

REPCON details

Date reported 10/06/2026
Published date 12/10/2026
Affected operation/industry Facilities Management
Concern subject type Communications
Transport mode Aviation