Jump to Content
Search
First page Previous page Page 1 of 16 Next page Last page Total records: 316
Safety issues and actions
Issue, description, who it affects Date, status, type
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2015-005-SI-03Open stern offshore support vessels
Number: MO-2015-005-SI-03
Description: MO-2015-005-SI-03:Skandi Pacific’s managers had not adequately assessed the risks associated with working on the aft deck of vessels with open sterns, including consideration of engineering controls to minimise water being shipped on the aft deck.
Who it affects: All owners and operators of offshore support vessels
Issue owner: DOF Management, Norway
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 23 Nov 2016
Status: Partially addressed
Type: Proactive Action
  Recommendation
  Safety Advisory Notice
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2015-005-SI-02Cargo securing procedures
Number: MO-2015-005-SI-02
Description: MO-2015-005-SI-02:Skandi Pacific’s safety management system (SMS) procedures for cargo securing were inadequate. There was no guidance for methods of securing cargo in adverse weather conditions.
Who it affects: All owners and operators of offshore support vessels
Issue owner: DOF Management, Norway
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 23 Nov 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2015-005-SI-01Cargo handling procedures
Number: MO-2015-005-SI-01
Description: MO-2015-005-SI-01:Skandi Pacific’s safety management system (SMS) procedures for cargo handling in adverse weather conditions were inadequate. Clearly defined weather limits when cargo handling operations could be undertaken and trigger points for suspending operations were not defined, including limits for excessive water on deck.
Who it affects: All owners and operators of offshore support vessels
Issue owner: DOF Management, Norway (DOF Management)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 23 Nov 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2015-002-SI-03 Contingency planning
Number: MO-2015-002-SI-03
Description: MO-2015-002-SI-03 :Fremantle Pilots’ procedures did not include any contingency plans, including abort points, for risks identified for the pilotage. 
Who it affects: All those responsible for a ship’s safe navigation
Issue owner: Fremantle Pilots
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 17 Oct 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2015-002-SI-02 Passage plan
Number: MO-2015-002-SI-02
Description: MO-2015-002-SI-02 :Fremantle Pilots’ publicly available information to assist ships' masters with preparing a berth to berth passage plan was inadequate and ineffectively implemented. The information provided consisted essentially of a list of waypoints, which was routinely not followed.  
Who it affects: All those responsible for a ship’s safe navigation
Issue owner: Fremantle Pilots
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 17 Oct 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2015-002-SI-01 Bridge resource management
Number: MO-2015-002-SI-01
Description: MO-2015-002-SI-01 :Bridge resource management (BRM) was not effectively implemented on board Maersk Garonne. The ship’s passage plan for the pilotage was inadequate, its bridge team members were not actively engaged in the pilotage and they did not effectively monitor the ship’s passage.
Who it affects: All those responsible for navigation
Issue owner: Maersk Line Ship Management, Singapore
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 17 Oct 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-009-SI-04Forecast terminology
Number: MO-2014-009-SI-04
Description: MO-2014-009-SI-04:Fremantle Ports’ staff did not understand the significance of some wind and weather terminology used in the BoM forecast. Consequently, port procedures triggered by a BoM ‘gale’ or ‘severe weather’ warning such as preparing the tugs and calling the harbour master were not followed.
Who it affects: Port and ship operators
Issue owner: Fremantle Port Authority (Fremantle Ports)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 04 May 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-009-SI-03Weather event management
Number: MO-2014-009-SI-03
Description: MO-2014-009-SI-03:Fremantle Ports’ procedures for adverse weather were not adequate for weather that could reasonably be expected to occur. Some procedures could not be reasonably implemented and other were not monitored for compliance.
Who it affects: All ships berthed in Fremantle’s Inner Harbour
Issue owner: Fremantle Port Authority (Fremantle Ports)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 04 May 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-009-SI-02Bureau of Meteorology weather warnings
Number: MO-2014-009-SI-02
Description: MO-2014-009-SI-02:The Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) marine forecast title of ‘strong wind warning’ understated the ‘damaging winds’ expected during the ‘severe thunderstorm’. The forecast did not use recognised marine weather terms for wind speed, such as ‘gale force’.
Who it affects: Port, boat and ship operators in Australian coastal waters
Issue owner: Bureau of Meteorology (BoM)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 04 May 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-009-SI-01Fremantle Ports’ risk assessment
Number: MO-2014-009-SI-01
Description: MO-2014-009-SI-01:Fremantle Ports’ assessment of risks associated with a ship contacting the Fremantle Rail Bridge as a result of a breakaway, particularly from berths 11 and 12, was limited. Preventing a breakaway from berths where the wind was likely to be on a ship’s beam had not been considered. Similarly, the ...
Who it affects: All users of Fremantle’s Inner Harbour, including the Fremantle Rail Bridge
Issue owner: Fremantle Port Authority (Fremantle Ports)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 04 May 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-09Ship firefighting cache
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-09
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-09:The large size and weight of the ship firefighting cache made it difficult for the duty Port Hedland volunteer firefighter to transport it to the wharf. 
Who it affects: All agencies charged with shipboard firefighting
Issue owner: Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES)
Operation affected: Marine: Shore-based operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Not addressed
Type: Recommendation
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-08Professional firefighters in Port Hedland
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-08
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-08:The limited professional firefighting capability in Port Hedland restricted the ability to launch an effective response to the fire on board Marigold.   
Who it affects: All agencies charged with shipboard firefighting
Issue owner: Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES)
Operation affected: Marine: Shore-based operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Not addressed
Type: Recommendation
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-07Access control
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-07
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-07:Suitable atmospheric testing equipment was not available in Port Hedland to ensure safe entry to fire-affected spaces on board Marigold. Access to these areas was not controlled until 53 hours after the fire.  
Who it affects: All agencies charged with shipboard firefighting in regional ports
Issue owner: DFES
Operation affected: Marine: Shore-based operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Not addressed
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-06Incident control
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-06
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-06:The emergency response plans for a ship fire in Port Hedland did not clearly define transfer of control procedures for successive incident controllers from different organisations or contain standard checklists for their use. 
Who it affects: All agencies charged with shipboard firefighting
Issue owner: HP Billiton
Operation affected: Marine: Shore-based operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Partially addressed
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-05International shore connectio
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-05
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-05:Port Hedland’s emergency response teams did not use the ship’s international shore fire connection. As a result, Marigold’s fire main was not pressurised with water from ashore.
Who it affects: All persons charged with shipboard firefighting
Issue owner: BHP Billiton and Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES)
Operation affected: Marine: Shore-based operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Partially addressed
Type: Recommendation
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-04Halon system
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-04
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-04:Marigold’s shipboard procedures for crew induction, familiarisation, fire drills and safety training were not effectively implemented. As a result, the ship’s senior officers were not sufficiently familiar with the Halon system’s operation. They did not identify its partial failure and did not activate the override function
Who it affects: All persons responsible for the maintenance of equipment
Issue owner: Korea Leading Company of Ship Management (KLCSM)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-03Fixed fire suppression system
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-03
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-03:Marigold’s Halon gas fixed fire suppression system for the engine room was not fully operational. The multiple failures of the system at the time of the fire were not consistent with proper maintenance and testing.  
Who it affects: All persons responsible for the maintenance of equipment
Issue owner: KLCSM
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Partially addressed
Type: Proactive Action
  Recommendation
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-02Ventilation closedown
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-02
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-02:The maintenance of the opening/closing arrangements for Marigold’s engine room fire dampers, ventilators and other openings was inadequate. A number of these could not be closed, resulting in the inability to seal the engine room to contain and suppress the fire.
Who it affects: All persons responsible for the maintenance of equipment
Issue owner: Korea Leading Company of Ship Management (KLCSM)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-008-SI-01Fire doors
Number: MO-2014-008-SI-01
Description: MO-2014-008-SI-01:A number of Marigold’s engine room fire doors were held open by wire and/or rope. The open doors allowed the smoke to spread across the engine room and into the accommodation spaces.
Who it affects: All persons responsible for the maintenance of equipment
Issue owner: Korea Leading Company of Ship Management (KLCSM)
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 20 Apr 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
Type: Proactive Action
Issue, description, who it affects
Issue: MO-2014-012-SI-02 Smoking risk controls
Number: MO-2014-012-SI-02
Description: MO-2014-012-SI-02 :The smoking policy and associated risk controls on board Ocean Drover were not effectively managed. While use of designated smoking rooms was identified as the preferred option, smoking was permitted in cabins. In addition, approved ashtrays were not always used to extinguish and dispose of cigarettes.
Who it affects: All persons responsible for shipboard operations
Issue owner: Korkyra Shipping, Croatia
Operation affected: Marine: Shipboard operations
Date, status, type
Date: 11 Mar 2016
Status: Adequately addressed
First page Previous page Page 1 of 16 Next page Last page Total records: 316
 
Share this page Comment