Jump to Content
Download Final Report
[ Download PDF: 16KB]
 
 
 
History of the flight Prior to landing West Sale, the crew were advised by air traffic control that the weather conditions at Latrobe Valley, their next landing point after West Sale, were wind 270/5, cloud seven oktas at 800 ft and visibility 5000 m. Considering these conditions, the pilot in command elected to fly from West Sale to Latrobe Valley, a distance of 25 NM, at 4000 ft and make an NDB approach at Latrobe Valley. Weather conditions enroute were considered marginal for a VFR flight below the cloud base. The minimum descent altitude for the NDB approach at Latrobe Valley is 1000 ft so the crew were aware they may not get into Latrobe Valley. When they taxied for departure at West Sale, the crew were advised by air traffic control that another aircraft had flown to Latrobe Valley visually below 1000 feet above ground level and made a successful approach and landing, about 40 minutes previously. On the basis of this information, the pilot in command decided to follow the same procedure. An alternative course of action, in the event that visual reference was lost, was planned and briefed prior to departure. The aircraft then departed and according to the crew, proceeded visually below the cloud at a reduced airspeed of 170 to 180kt, at 500 to 700 feet above ground level with a flight visibility of about 5000 metres. Approaching Latrobe Valley all appropriate checks were completed. Calculated landing weight was 6400 kg which equated to a target threshold speed (Vref)ilot in command could not recall any Vref minus calls. The captain did not respond to Vref minus calls by application of power. Touchdown was heavy and both crew members agreed there had been no landing flare. The co-pilot sensed an increased sink rate shortly before touchdown but did not note the vertical speed indication. The crew found no damage to the aircraft during a post flight inspection. However, the day after the occurrence, minor damage consistent with a heavy landing was discovered. An inspection of the runway threshold, after the occurrence, revealed that the aircraft had touched down just prior to the threshold and had hit and broken two frangible runway end lights. The investigation As part of the investigation, the flight data recorder was read out. This revealed that at touchdown, airspeed had reduced to below Vref and sink rate was high (approx:102 kt/1000 ft/min+). Runway 03/21 at Latrobe Valley is 1430 metres long, is narrow (an 18 metre wide sealed section), has no touchdown zone markings or approach guidance lighting (eg TVASIS). Visibility was reported by the crew to be about 5000 metres at the airfield and deteriorating. Light rain was falling. The pilot in command did not turn on the windscreen wipers because on long final approach, speed was in excess of the windscreen wiper limit speed and later on final he was reluctant to divert his attention from flying the approach to the wiper control switch. The crew did not activate the runway lighting which may have assisted with approach angle guidance. The pilot in command stated that he was aiming to touch down just past the piano keys (the threshold) due to the runway being wet, narrow and having a downslope (0.4% down to the southwest). The pilot in command acknowledged that he clearly misjudged the approach in that the aircraft touched down before he had initiated a landing flare. It is possible that there may have been a visual illusion created by the combination of a narrow runway, reduced visibility and rain on the windscreen. Safety action As a result of its investigation the company has instituted the following measures: 1. The Metro Operations Manuals are being amended to reflect the requirement to call excessive sink rate on final approach. 2. The operator has distributed an aircrew circular describing techniques which assist in overcoming visual illusions associated with approaches to narrow runways, particularly in reduced visibility conditions. 3. Runway lights are to be activated on narrow runways to assist in assessing approach angle. 4. All flight crew members are to complete crew resource management courses.
Download Final Report
[ Download PDF: 16KB]
 
 
 
 
General details
Date: 28 February 1996 Investigation status: Completed 
Time: 13:25 ESuT Investigation type: Occurrence Investigation 
 Occurrence type:Hard landing 
 Occurrence class: Operational 
Release date: 15 July 1996 Occurrence category: Incident 
Report status: Final  
 
Aircraft details
Aircraft manufacturer: Fairchild Industries Inc 
Aircraft model: SA227-AC 
Aircraft registration: VH-NEK 
Sector: Turboprop 
Damage to aircraft: Minor 
Departure point:West Sale Vic
Destination:Latrobe Valley Vic
 
 
 
Share this page Provide feedback on this investigation
Last update 21 October 2014