Jump to Content
Download Final Report
[ Download PDF: 17KB]
 
 
 

The grade one flying instructor was ferrying the kit helicopter to Mangalore where he planned to teach the owner/builder how to fly it. About five minutes after departure, at 2000 feet, the pilot noticed an abnormal forward position for the cyclic in the cruise. Fearing that there may be a problem with the cyclic control rigging, he elected to turn back to the nearest airfield which was Pakenham. The cyclic control suddenly became very heavy and difficult to push to the left. However, for a short time it remained free to move in other directions. Then, without pilot input, the helicopter rolled to the right. The pilot was unable to prevent a right turn. When the helicopter had turned onto south, the cyclic suddenly became loose and then stiff intermittently. Fearing that something in the control system was about to fail completely, the pilot entered auto-rotation in an attempt to descend and land as quickly as possible. During the descent, the helicopter pitched nose high then low severely, to the extent that the pilot thought the main rotor might cut off the tail-boom. He discovered that by maintaining rotor RPM and raising the collective lever when the nose pitched down, and lowering the collective when the nose pitched up, he was able to use the secondary effects of collective control to counteract some of the uncommanded pitching and rolling. Nearing the ground the pilot was able to execute a flare to eliminate all forward speed. At about ten feet AGL, the helicopter pitched nose up and rolled to the right. The pilot closed the throttle and allowed the helicopter to sink, expecting it to roll over on the ground. However, he managed to land firmly without damage. While shutting down, the pilot noticed that the cyclic was stirring in circles by itself. Subsequently, the helicopter was inspected by engineers. No restriction of the cyclic control system was detected. The helicopter owner subsequently advised the investigating CAA Airworthiness Surveyor that there was mention in the manufacturer's data that cyclic control problems may occur in hot conditions. On the day of this incident the outside temperature was 34 degrees Celsius. The investigation by the CAA has revealed that the friction adjustment of the slider ball (uniball) was temperature sensitive and caused binding of the cyclic control system. The CAA considered that the instructions provided by the kit helicopter manufacturer to address the cyclic binding problem were unacceptable. The CAA was not made aware of the potentially hazardous problem during the application for the amateur built aircraft approval process. Until improved, the Rotorway EXEC 90 does not comply with the Australian flight characteristics requirements for amateur built helicopters.

Significant Factors

The following factors were considered relevant to the development of the incident:

1. The friction adjustment of the slider ball (uniball) was temperature sensitive.

2. Cyclic control binding resulted in significant loss of primary control in flight.

3. According to the CAA, manufacturer's instructions to rectify the potential cyclic control problem were inadequate.

4. Neither the helicopter manufacturer nor the Australian agent made the CAA aware of potential loss of cyclic control during the application for the amateur built aircraft approval.

5. The helicopter does not meet Australian design standards.

6. The pilot was unaware of a potential cyclic control problem until he encountered it in flight. SAFETY ACTION The CAA has withdrawn permits to fly the Rotorway EXEC 90 and will not issue a Certificate of Airworthiness to the helicopter type until convinced that the cyclic control system will operate in a satisfactory manner, with no mechanical degradation, and with a useful life, over a full range of temperatures including hot and cold soak likely to be encountered in normal Australian operations from minus 15 degrees Celsius to plus 45 degrees.

Download Final Report
[ Download PDF: 17KB]
 
 
 
 
General details
Date: 11 January 1995 Investigation status: Completed 
Time: 12:30 ESuT Investigation type: Occurrence Investigation 
 Occurrence type:Flight control systems 
 Occurrence class: Technical 
Release date: 29 March 1995 Occurrence category: Incident 
Report status: Final  
 
Aircraft details
Aircraft manufacturer: Amateur Built Aircraft 
Aircraft model: EXEC 90 
Aircraft registration: VH-TKO 
Sector: Helicopter 
Damage to aircraft: Nil 
Departure point:Koo Wee Rup VIC
Destination:Mangalore VIC
 
 
 
Share this page Provide feedback on this investigation
Last update 21 October 2014